- So You Want to Talk About Race - Ijeoma Oluo
- How to Be an Antiracist (Unabridged) - Ibram X. Kendi
- White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism (Unabridged) - Robin DiAngelo
- Hustle Harder, Hustle Smarter - 50 Cent
- Camino Winds (Unabridged) - John Grisham
- The Terminal List (Unabridged) - Jack Carr
- You Are a Badass: How to Stop Doubting Your Greatness and Start Living an Awesome Life - Jen Sincero
- Good Omens - Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett
- Open Book - Jessica Simpson
- A Minute to Midnight - David Baldacci
en apple news
آخرین مطالب
امکانات وب
Apple's years-long fight with Samsung Electronics over design patents will make its way to the US Supreme Court.
The nation's highest court on Monday agreed to review the case, the first time it has looked at a design patent case since the 1800s.
Samsung filed a request with the Supreme Court in December to re-examine the case after losing in court to Apple, which resulted in Samsung's requirement to pay Apple $548 million.
Apple shot back in February, calling the case "legally unexceptional" and asking the Supreme Court not to "prolong" the battle against Samsung. Apple also argued that the case didn't present a question important enough to require resolution at the top of the US judicial system.
A decision by the Supreme Court could have a ripple effect across the technology industry and the kinds of gadgets you'll be able to buy because it could finally define the value of design work. For that reason, the case has drawn the attention of a wide number of legal experts, nonprofit organizations and technology companies. Together, they filed six amicus, or "friend of the court," briefs in support of Samsung, urging the Supreme Court to consider the case.
Some of Silicon Valley's biggest players, including Google and Facebook, argued in the amicus briefs that the lower-court ruling as it stands may have a "devastating impact" on the introduction of new products due to a heightened fear of legal challenges. Apple has said all along that it was doing what was necessary to defend its intellectual property and the value of its blockbuster iPhone franchise.
Representatives for Apple and Samsung weren't immediately available for comment.
The last time the Supreme Court looked at a suit involving design patents was in the 1800s. Those cases involved a spoon handle, carpet, saddle and rug. Since that time, a few things have changed, such as the introduction of electronic devices from the likes of Apple and Samsung.
Samsung wants the Supreme Court to give guidance on what is covered by design patents, which protect the way an item is used and how it works and which cover what damages can be collected.
The original 2012 trial, which pitted a pair of the world's largest tech companies against each other, captivated Silicon Valley and the tech industry because it exposed the ier workings of two notoriously secretive companies. It was just one of many trials around the world as the rivals sparred both in the marketplace and in the courtroom. At issue were design patents for a black, rectangular, round-coered front face; a similar rectangular round-coered front face plus the surrounding rim, known as the bezel; and a colorful grid of 16 icons.
Apple and Samsung last year agreed to bury the hatchet in their overseas cases, but their US suits have continued. In early December, Samsung said it would pay Apple the $548 million ordered by court.
The next round of Apple v. Samsung kicks off March 28 with a damages retrial in San Jose, Califoia.
ما را در سایت en apple news دنبال میکنید
برچسب: نویسنده: استخدام کار بازدید: 212