Don't mess with my "Orange is the New Black" binge.

Angry Netflix customers are a force to be reckoned with, and they're the ones owed an explanation as to why the company would slow down transmission of its video service to some wireless customers without informing them.
Netflix found itself in the hot seat after admitting it had slowed service to Verizon and AT&T customers for five years in a Wall Street Joual story Thursday. What's more, the company said the policy excluded customers of T-Mobile and Sprint.
Critics immediately cried foul on Netflix, noting the hypocrisy of a company that two years ago led a fight to require the Federal Communications Commission to adopt "strong" Net neutrality rules that would ban operators from slowing traffic under almost any circumstances. It also wanted the FCC to require operators to be more transparent in how they manage their networks.
But the most galling aspect may be that Netflix never notified its customers it was slowing their service.
"There is nothing wrong with what Netflix is doing " said Berin Szoka, president of TechFreedom, a group that has opposed the FCC's Net neutrality regulations. "Except for not making it public."
Harold Feld with Public Knowledge an organization that pushed hard for Net neutrality rules agrees.
"This is not a Net neutrality issue," Feld said. "But I'm not going to defend what Netflix did here. It was really a screw-up not to tell their customers about what they were doing."
Why isn't this a Net neutrality issue? The FCC's Net neutrality rules passed a year ago prohibit slowing or blocking traffic and require that companies are open about their practices with customers. But the rules only apply to Inteet service providers. The same standards are not required of Inteet companies like Netflix.
Net neutrality advocates like Feld and Matt Wood of Free Press also point out that a video company offering a service can't "throttle" itself. It is free to transmit its video at whatever quality it wishes. The concept of "throttling" is really meant to describe when a company like a broadband provider, which controls access to the Inteet for a consumer, slows down or blocks access on that coection to another service.
It could be argued that Netflix had its customers' best interests at heart when it implemented its practice. Viewing two hours of Netflix in high-definition quality could easily eat up an entire month's worth of data.
The company, which declined to comment beyond its blog, said as much.
"We believe restrictive data caps are bad for consumers and the Inteet in general, creating a dilemma for those who increasingly rely on their mobile devices for entertainment, work and more," Ae Marie Squeo wrote in the blog on behalf of Netflix. "It's about striking a balance that ensures a good streaming experience while avoiding unplaed fines from mobile providers."
Netflix already offers customers the ability to adjust the settings to stream their data at a higher or lower quality, which could help them manage their data. What's more, the service automatically adjusts its stream to a higher or lower quality when the service detects network congestion. But the fact that Netflix defaulted to a lower quality for all customers across the board on only two carriers without informing customers is the problem.
"When a company does stuff for you that's supposed to be for your own good, but it doesn't tell you it's doing it, it gives you an icky feeling," Feld said.
Netflix explained on its blog how it slowed down traffic to 600 kilobits per second in an effort to protect customers who were in danger of exceeding their mobile caps. It also mentioned it will introduce a new "data saver" feature for mobile apps in May to allow some subscribers to choose either to stream more, but lower-quality video if they have a smaller-capacity data plan or to increase video quality if they have a less-restrictive plan. But the company offered no explanation for why it kept its practice for the past five years. When asked about this, specifically, the company declined to comment.
Netflix may not have violated the FCC's rules, but that doesn't mean it's in the clear. The fact the company didn't disclose its practice to customers could be seen as deceptive and unfair under the Federal Trade Commission's rules. While Netflix discloses a number of factors in its Terms of Use policy that explain how the quality of service might be degraded, it never mentions one of those factors might be the company capping the speed at which it transmits the service. It also never explains that customers of some wireless companies and not others might see the quality of their service degraded.
"There's no question that Netflix has done something wrong by deceiving its customers," Feld said. "But not everything bad on the Inteet is a Net neutrality violation."
برچسب:
نویسنده: استخدام کار